Southampton have claimed their expulsion from the Championship play-off final is unacceptable despite admitting to breaching EFL regulations over the ‘spygate’ scandal.
On Tuesday evening, the Saints were expelled from the Championship play-offs, with Middlesbrough reinstated, after a member of their backroom staff was caught watching Boro’s training ahead of the first leg of their play-off semi-final.
According to the EFL, Southampton admitted “multiple breaches” relating to the unauthorised filming of their opponents’ training ahead of games against Oxford and Ipswich, as well as the clash with Middlesbrough.
In addition, Southampton were handed a four-point deduction for next season. They have submitted an appeal and Sky Sports News understands the hearing will begin at 6pm on Wednesday. The EFL has acknowledged this could result in a further change to Saturday’s fixture, which is now scheduled to see Hull City take on Middlesbrough.
Southampton chief executive Phil Parsons has now released a statement, admitting fault but also arguing that the ruling is “manifestly disproportionate” to the offence.
“We have appealed yesterday’s decision by the Independent Disciplinary Commission to expel Southampton Football Club from the Sky Bet Championship Play-Offs, and to impose a four-point deduction for the 2026/27 season,” the statement issued at 2pm on Wednesday read.
“Before turning to that appeal, I want to address our supporters, our players, and the wider football community directly and without equivocation.
“What happened was wrong. The club has admitted breaches of EFL Regulations 3.4 and 127. We are sorry to the other clubs involved, and most of all to the Southampton supporters whose extraordinary loyalty and support this season deserved better from the club.
“We have provided our full co-operation to the EFL’s investigation and disciplinary process. Following the appeal, we will also be writing to the EFL to volunteer our participation in a working group on the practical application and enforcement of Regulation 127 across the Championship. Contrition without change is hollow, and we intend to demonstrate change.
“On the appeal itself: we accept that there should be a sanction. What we cannot accept is a sanction which bears no proportion to the offence. Whereas Leeds United was fined £200,000 for a similar offence, Southampton has been denied the opportunity to compete in a game worth more than £200m and one which means so much to our staff, players and supporters.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Charlie Austin reflects on the decision to ban Southampton from the play-off final following the ‘spygate’ scandal and insists the EFL has made the correct decision against his former club
“We believe the financial consequence of yesterday’s ruling makes it, by a very considerable distance, the largest penalty ever imposed on an English football club. Luton Town’s 30-point deduction in 2008/09 – to date the most severe sporting sanction in the English game – was levied against a club already in League Two, with no comparable revenue at stake. Derby County’s 21-point deduction in 2021 cost them their Championship status. Everton’s eventual six-point deduction in 2023/24 followed losses of £124.5m, a figure dwarfed by what has been taken from Southampton in a single afternoon.
“The largest financial penalty ever levied by the Premier League, against Chelsea in March of this year, was £10.75m, and was accompanied by no sporting sanction whatsoever despite involving £47.5m in undisclosed payments over seven years.
“We say this not to minimise what occurred at this club, which we have accepted was wrong. We say it because proportionality is itself a principle of natural justice. The Commission was entitled to impose a sanction. It was not, we will argue, entitled to impose one that is manifestly disproportionate to every previous sanction in the history of the English game.
“Our appeal will be heard today, and we will provide a further update in due course.”
Why Southampton are confident about their appeal
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Mark McAdam reveals the frustration of Southampton officials following their sanction for ‘spygate’
Sky Sports News reporter Mark McAdam said Saints are “shocked and flabbergasted” by the verdict.
“Southampton believe they will be successful upon appeal; however, there is a long day ahead,” McAdam said.
“There is a confidence inside the club that this will be overturned.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Southampton have been expelled from the Championship play-offs over the ‘spygate’ scandal. The club, who have a right to appeal the verdict, will also receive a four-point deduction for next season’s Championship
“Over the course of the last 24 hours, Southampton’s lawyers have been working throughout the course of the night to make sure they are fully prepared for the appeal.
“They will fight this robustly until the bitter end. You have to remember Southampton are appealing the punishment and not the crime in this situation.
“Southampton are appealing to an independent league arbitration panel. That is made up of three different members to those on the independent disciplinary commission which decided their initial sanction.
“Some might say this is a more senior panel at the meeting today to discuss what happened yesterday and Southampton’s appeal.”
Hull City owner expresses frustration over play-off final change
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Hull City owner Acun Ilicali says its not fair we don’t know who we will play in the play-off final, Southampton or Middlesbrough?
With Middlesbrough now taking the place of Southampton in Saturday’s play-off final, the club’s owner Acun Ilicali told Sky Sports of his frustration surrounding the lack of clarity over the richest game in football, with his players having spent over a week preparing to play Tonda Eckert’s side.
“We are very disappointed. This is football, we are here to talk about football, to talk about tactics, who we will play and our dreams,” Ilicali said. “In the most vital week of the year, we are talking about things that are completely out of our control.
“I don’t want to accuse anybody and until we see the full picture, but it has had too much of an affect on us.
“For eight days, we prepared for Southampton. Now, it’s off so there’s no training. Wednesdays we always give off to the boys then it comes to Thursday and Friday. It’s maybe one full day of preparation. We miss nine days of training so in this case, we are very disappointed. I believe in the boys and our coach 100 per cent, but over the course of two days, we have to change everything.”
Ilicali refused to rule out the possibility of taking further action if Hull are made to play Middlesbrough at Wembley on Saturday and lose. However, he did say that Hull didn’t deserve to be handed promotion, and that Boro replacing Southampton in the final was the fairest option.
“In order to finish this mess, I think Middlesbrough has to be chosen as the winner in this game so that they can go to the final,” he added.
“Then there is another question – in Middlesbrough’s evidence of this game, is there enough to announce Middlesbrough the winner? This this another point. If there is big evidence, maybe it is OK. But if there is no evidence of this game that Middlesbrough can go to the final, then people say why are they there?”
