The video assistant referee causes controversy every week, whether it be the Premier League, Champions League or FA Cup, but now we have a 104-game FIFA men’s World Cup to cover, so how are the decisions made this summer and are they correct?
For the tournament, we are taking a look at the major incidents to examine and explain the process in terms of both VAR protocol and the laws of the game.
Jump to: Mexico vs. SA: Three reds
Andy Davies (@andydaviesref) is a former Select Group referee, with over 12 seasons on the elite list, working across the Premier League and Championship. With extensive experience at the elite level, he has operated within the VAR space in the Premier League and offers a unique insight into the processes, rationale and protocols that are delivered on a World Cup matchday.
Referee: Danny Makkelie
VAR: Carlos Del Cerro Grande
Time: 53rd minute
Incident: After originally giving USMNT defender Tim Ream a yellow card, the referee was called to the screen and reissued it to Paraguay’s Miguel Almirón.
After a VAR check for mistaken identity, Miguel Almirón is shown a yellow card 🟨 pic.twitter.com/XeD17F7hnV
— FOX Sports (@FOXSports) June 13, 2026
What happened: Ream, the U.S. team captain, was initially given a yellow card for what appeared to be a careless trip on Paraguay attacker Almirón. However, after the incident was reviewed by VAR and the referee at the screen, it was clear that Ream made no contact with the attacker, and his yellow was rescinded. Almirón received the yellow card for simulation.
VAR review: One of FIFA’s new laws allows VAR to intervene when a player is shown a yellow or red card, but the offense for which the card was shown was committed by another player of either team.
Verdict: When a player clearly deceives the referee, and as a result, an opposing player receives an unfair yellow card, that is a positive addition to the laws. The initial yellow to Ream was an understandable decision in real-time by the referee, but Almirón clearly tries to win a free kick by committing an act of simulation, and his delayed yellow card is justified. This was a good application of the new laws and will hopefully discourage players from diving in these situations.
Referee: Wilton Pereira Sampaio
VAR: Nicolás Gallo Barragán
Time: 49 minutes
Incident: Red card to South Africa’s Sphephelo Sithole for denial of a goal-scoring opportunity (DOGSO).
What happened: South Africa were 1-0 down as the second half kicked off, and they were soon down to 10 players when Sithole was shown a red card for bringing down Mexico midfielder Brian Gutiérrez, who was through on goal. The VAR checked the decision and judged it to be correct.
Verdict: Sithole will go down in history as the first player to be shown a red card at this World Cup, and this was a relatively easy decision.
Mexico’s Gutiérrez cut across the South Africa defender and was tripped in the process, causing him to go down. Gutiérrez had a clear opportunity to score with his next action, so the resulting red card was the correct decision.
South Africa is shown a red card and is down to 10 men! 🟥 pic.twitter.com/HnPqExqTRq
— FOX Sports (@FOXSports) June 11, 2026
Time: 84 minutes
Incident: Red card to South Africa’s Themba Zwane for violent conduct for striking an opponent.
What happened: Zwane attempted to move past Mexico’s Roberto Alvarado, but his hand caught Alvarado’s face in the process. The referee did not initially issue a red card, but did so after a VAR review.
Verdict: I felt this was a harsh decision considering the red card was given for “violent conduct/an act of brutality,” and I do not believe this was either.
When you strike an opponent and there is contact to the face, there is a danger that it could be judged as violent conduct, and you run the risk of receiving a red card. Given the amount of time the referee spent at the screen watching replays, though, I do not believe he was completely convinced this was a violent act.
But once at the screen, it would have been a very brave decision not to take the action he did, given the information fed to him by the VAR.
South Africa is down to 9 players after a second red card 🟥 pic.twitter.com/uS87sjfQlI
— FOX Sports (@FOXSports) June 11, 2026
Time: 90+2 minutes
Incident: Red card for Mexico defender César Montes for denial of a goal-scoring opportunity (DOGSO).
What happened: South Africa broke in numbers and had four players on three as Khuliso Mudau raced toward the box. Montes got across and clipped him just outside the box, and the referee was quick to show a red card. The VAR reviewed the decision and judged it to be correct.
Verdict: I was surprised by the on-field decision of a red card as I did not feel this was an obvious goal-scoring opportunity.
For this to completely meet the threshold of DOGSO, the referee has be sure that the attacker’s next touch is going to be a shot on goal or his direction of play is directly in on goal. In my opinion, this situation did not completely meet the criteria required for a red card. The attacker’s next action was more likely to be a cross to his teammate as opposed to a shot on goal, making this a possible goal-scoring opportunity and not an obvious one.
But I would not expect the VAR to interfere with this decision as it would not be judged as a “clear and obvious” error given the level of subjectivity around the attacker’s next action, whether it be a shot or cross.
César Montes is sent off 🟥
This is the first time 3 players have been shown a red card in a FIFA World Cup opening match pic.twitter.com/GCC20sv3gz
— FOX Sports (@FOXSports) June 11, 2026
